Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Academic Research Skills for Claude Code: research → write → review → revise → finalize
Build with Backblaze B2
SDKs, agent skills, IDE extensions, and reference pipelines from Backblaze Labs. All open source.
Loading star history...
Where it stands
Rank, growth pace and release cadence relative to everything GStars tracks.
5 releases in the last 90 days, the latest 4 days ago, with 27 contributors on GitHub.
Use Cases & Benefits
- Provides a comprehensive AI-augmented pipeline for academic research, writing, reviewing, and finalizing papers using Claude Code skills.
- Ensures research integrity with multi-stage verification, claim auditing, and human-in-the-loop oversight to reduce AI hallucinations and improve citation accuracy.
- Use for guided Socratic research and systematic literature reviews to structure and deepen academic inquiry.
- Use for multi-agent academic paper writing with style calibration, citation formatting, and revision coaching.
- Use for multi-perspective peer review with quality rubrics, methodology checks, and calibration against gold standards.
Should you depend on it?
License terms, project hygiene and risks, from GitHub metadata and GStars' snapshots.
License
Other
GitHub could not identify this license; read the LICENSE file before depending on it.
Community files
- README: present
- Contributing guide: present
Watch-outs
- License not identified by GitHub; read the LICENSE file before depending on it.
General guidance from repository metadata, not legal advice. How we score
From the README
A comprehensive suite of Claude Code skills for academic research, covering the full pipeline from research to publication.
Install in 30 seconds (Claude Code CLI / VS Code / JetBrains, v3.7.0+):
Then try
/ars-planto walk through your paper structure via Socratic dialogue, or jump to Quick install for prerequisites and the traditional symlink flow.AI is your copilot, not the pilot. This tool won't write your paper for you. It handles the grunt work — hunting down references, formatting citations, verifying data, checking logical consistency — so you can focus on the parts that actually require your brain: defining the question, choosing the method, interpreting what the data means, and writing the sentence after "I argue that."
Unlike a humanizer, this tool doesn't help you hide the fact that you used AI. It helps you write better. Style Calibration learns your voice from past work. Writing Quality Check catches the patterns that make prose feel machine-generated. The goal is quality, not cheating.
Lu et al. (2026, Nature 651:914-919) built The AI Scientist — the first fully autonomous AI research system to publish a paper through blind peer review at a top-tier ML venue (ICLR 2025 workshop, score 6.33/10 vs workshop average 4.87). Their Limitations section enumerates the failure modes that any fully-autonomous AI research pipeline inherits: implementation bugs, hallucinated results, shortcut reliance, bug-as-insight reframing, methodology fabrication, frame-lock, citation hallucinations.
Daily snapshots
Stars gained per day, and how forks and open issues moved, from GStars' daily snapshots
+14,149 stars over 90 days across 22 snapshot days; best day +710 on Sep 2.
Forks
4.3K+928
Open issues
41+25
Compared with peers in LLM
Fastest-growing repositories GStars tracks in this cohort for the week of Nov 8, by 7-day star growth
| Repository | Stars | +7d | Health | Last release |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA/auto-ontology | 11.4K | +8.5K | 75 | — |
| thedotmack/claude-mem | 115.8K | +4.7K | 75 | today |
| DietrichGebert/ponytail | 188.4K | +4.4K | 75 | 12 days ago |
| affaan-m/ECC | 300.8K | +4.3K | 75 | 40 days ago |
| Graphify-Labs/graphify | 145.7K | +3.8K | 75 | today |
| Imbad0202/academic-research-skills | 56.4K | — | 75 | 4 days ago |
| Category median | 145.7K | +4.4K | 75 | — |
Discover Repositories
Search across tracked repositories by name or description